how many contradiction does it take to make one a hypocrite?
is it one enough? two? three?
that's what i tend to overlook at times.
what i tend to forget.
but im still gonna be frank here
and contradict myself
because, however, it's still no excuse, right?
is it one enough? two? three?
albeit there seemed to be no definite measure of how many of contradiction it takes to call one a hypocrite, in most cases one is enough to put the label on someone. one. isnt that too cruel? because at the end of the day human contradicts themselves almost quite frequently. that's a calling of nature of change, in light of the only definite entity in science. people change their minds time and again, taking account into a process of thinking. its safe to say its only natural to be caught up into contradicting what we thought at some point in the past. does it make human a bunch of hypocrites?
that's what i tend to overlook at times.
what i tend to forget.
that there's no such thing as finality. i was way too naive so i believed in every words people say. i held onto every words people say, overanalyzed small phrases and sentences. not to mention we live in an era where people documenting every thoughts and conversations all across social networks and chatting messengers. making it easier to use what people say against them at some point. considering people say what they don't mean, like, 50% of the time. it's no brainer i got where i am right now then. got dragged around for clinging to what people said and believing things easily, gets things messier. had i known better, i probably wouldnt have ended up here. so please note: there's no such thing as finality in what people say, what people think about.
but im still gonna be frank here
and contradict myself
because, however, it's still no excuse, right?
even though contradiction is seen as usual behaviour, doesn't it feel wrong for people to blindly dismiss what others say and what others think? because naivety also involves a form of ignorance by deeming when one theory is right, others are simply wrong. just because there's a possibility of change, that doesn't cancel out the truth element in what people say. or think. so complicated as it sounds, to develop a more careful observation, isnt that the only choice left to work? like there should be a clear line between what deemed as right and wrong values, even in general. things that supposed to be a constant in the long run, not easily replaced, no matter how many times other thoughts change and contradict themselves over some period of times. it goes way above one minute moment of misunderstanding, pent up emotion, biased judgment, etc you name it. sounds tricky for mere acquaintances and strangers, but not as much for close people around. especially those you basically live with for whole your life. will it be wise to use it as a tool to assess information needed to make a presumption of others so i will dangit stop being so freaking naive?
that doesn't make everyone of us a hypocrite.
that doesn't make a simple contradiction turn people into hypocrites.
-
now to answer
what was the last thing i said that i dont mean anymore
idk. something along 'no needing help' or 'go away' perhaps.
